A strange year for cinema, with a very obvious hesitancy from the big studios in terms of their release strategies. Quite a few films that would’ve been tentpole multiplex releases pre-Covid instead got dumped straight to streaming (Turning Red, Prey) or rushed through a very limited cinematic release (Glass Onion was the most curious example of this, as it could easily have made good money in theaters).
These portents of doom for cinema-going were balanced by the thumping successes of things like Top Gun: Maverick and Avatar, on the one hand, and Everything Everywhere All at Once and RRR, on the other (smaller) hand. Yet for every success story there were multiple failures, some of them incredibly dispiriting (turns out very few care about Spielberg’s origin story, The Fabelmans, at least in the US). So it goes every year, but this year the stakes felt higher, with every high-profile failure of an original content film seeming more and more like an ominous sign for the future of such things being released into cinemas.
The solution is to go and see as many original films in cinemas as you can, if and when you can, rather than giving in to the temptation of waiting till they get released on streaming platforms. Otherwise, we will soon see cinemas becoming the exclusive reserve of blockbuster sequels and Disney/Marvel content, whilst all smaller films just go straight to streaming.
That’s already the situation here in China, where I’m living, with the result that in actual fact I, a serious cinephile, have seen a grand total of one new film in the cinema this year (Avatar: The Way of Water – it was ok). Almost no good things are released here, simple as that, just the sure-fire multiplex-fillers. But that just goes to show that the variety of different films available for us to view in the west is as a result of a relatively healthy democracy, of artistic freedom and therefore variety of expression. If we lose that variety, I can’t help but worry what it will do to our already splintering sense of democratic freedom. A monolithic culture, of the sort that the Chinese government aspires to, is not the sort that I believe we should aspire to in the west.
These are all big-picture worries about the industry, though. In the meantime, as always, I found many reasons for optimism in the film industry on a smaller level, in terms of the many considerable talents still working in film today. I continue to be blown away by the consistent quality of work coming from directors from all over the world, from Joachim Trier in Norway to Park Chan-wook in South Korea, Ryusuke Hamaguchi in Japan to Terence Davies in the UK. Fighting the good fight and producing thoughtful, meaningful works that tackle modern-day issues, or those of the recent past, it’s still possible to learn things about the world from these masters, plus from new blood like Charlotte Wells (whose Aftersun is easily the most promising debut of the year) and relatively new blood like Jordan Peele (who finally won me over with a film about a monster that’s an allegory for cinema, amongst other things).
If there are no big blockbusters on my list below, don’t blame me. I tried. I’m apparently immune to the charms of Top Gun: Maverick, as I am to any film where special effects are the main reason for watching, though maybe watching it on my laptop was the problem. I liked what I read about The Batman being a noir-like detective piece so much that I sat through the whole thing before throwing up my hands in despair at yet another generic superhero flick being way overhyped for being “dark”. It caused me a lot more pain to conclude that Everything Everywhere All at Once and RRR weren’t quite good enough to make my list, because I was (and still am) rooting for them, as inventive original ideas but also as subtitled fare in a market that usually precludes such fare from success. I’m glad they made money, but I can’t lie about my mixed reactions to them. Perhaps because I’ve lived in China for a few years and encountered quite a few gay people here struggling with their parents, the cheesy chocolate-box resolution to the family conflict in Everything Everywhere All at Once didn’t impress or move me like it did so many others, and the hyperactive editing just made me pine for more solid, quiet moments like the scene between the two rocks. Meanwhile, RRR was absolute dynamite in its action scenes, sure, but the romance sections that took up too much of its running time were so terrible – in writing, acting, music; all departments – it made it impossible for me to wholeheartedly endorse the film.
I’m a picky bastard – that’s what watching films obsessively does to you. It makes it harder to accept mediocrity when it arises, due to the awareness that there are much better films you could be watching instead.
These are those films.
1: The Worst Person in the World (dir. Joachim Trier)
Third part of the director’s “Oslo Trilogy” (after Reprise and the outstanding Oslo, August 31st) is the most expansive and ambitious of the lot, and a little unwieldy as a result. But it succeeds as a romantic comedy with updated topical concerns: this is a film about love in the age of climate anxiety, and how that impacts our affairs and also our desire to have kids. As with all of Joachim Trier’s films, it’s rooted in characters that you would want to follow and live with well past the film’s end. There’s not a sign of a “Worst Person in the World” in sight; main character Julie (delightfully played by Renate Reinsve) may flirt with cheating on her longtime partner, a middlle-aged cartoonist (Trier mainstay Anders Danielsen Lie), but she emphatically doesn’t want to hurt him. Trier’s depiction of Oslo’s middle class (nobody seems to worry about money in his films) is warm and affectionate, filled with flawed but never intentionally evil inhabitants, just trying to get by and using all of their powers to resist the impulse to do self-destructive things. A couple of fantastical sequences allow Trier and his cast to have some fun, utilising special effects, prosthetics and animation, all in the service of laughs. But cast, crew and director alike all get serious for an ending filmed with great empathy and haunting simplicity.
2: Decision to Leave (dir. Park Chan-wook)
A cat-and-mouse thriller about the sexual mind games played between a detective (Park Hae-il) and female murder suspect (Tang Wei), which makes it very reminiscent of Vertigo. But Park Chan-wook is his own man: more arty and less suspense-minded than Hitchcock. And he’s certainly one of the major figures in world cinema right now. For starters, he’s using digital photography like nobody else, with sharply composed wide and high-angle shots in high locales here that are as effective in creating a dizzying sense of disorientation as, well, the famous dolly zooms in Vertigo (that’s the last time I mention it, I promise). What’s more, to my delight, he’s slowly moving away from an obsession with grotesque violence to an obsession with unusual or, in the case of this film, even perverse romantic and sexual entanglements. Decision to Leave is a film about the difference between people who prefer mountains, with a clear view of everything, to people who prefer the sea (or fog), with a clear view of nothing. It’s a film about people who need mystery and violence in their lives in order to function. It’s all about the “thrill of the chase”, both in police investigations and love affiars. It’s about why people would leave one country for another, one city for another, the state of being alive for being dead. It’s a film you need to see.
3: Nope (dir. Jordan Peele)
Superb horror-western-comedy-satire, that like Get Out works on multiple levels, but feels slicker and even better to me. On its surface, it’s a simple monster movie, about a brother and sister, played by Daniel Kaluuya and Keke Palmer, trying to capture a mysterious flying creature on camera. But it’s no accident that there’s a subplot about an ape that loses its shit in a TV studio, plus there’s good reason why the California family’s business is training horses for movies. Because Peele’s overarching vision is of how the natural world, spectacle, and human beings with their cameras always at the ready intertwine in the modern world. There always seem to be humans ready to risk disaster to capture footage of dangerous natural phenommena, just as there are always humans ready to turn around and say “Nope”. I think Peele finds both groups fascinating, and proves that playing them off against each other makes for a great horror film. Shot with sweeping imagination using Imax cameras, performed with brittle humour by the cast (a laconic Kaluuya proves that he can do anything), edited and sound-mixed with supreme care. I say give Jordan Peele $100 million a year to make whatever he wants for the rest of his life.
4: Benediction (dir. Terence Davies)
Terence Davies’ second biography of a famous poet necessarily feels more personal than his Emily Dickinson one. Focusing on the secretly gay Siegfried Sassoon allows Davies to turn in a tragicomic look at how queer youths in the first half of the 20th century were forced into a “shadow world”, which was nearly as disabling for them as the First World War was for the lives of so many young men. Siegfried Sassoon actually existed in both shadow worlds, as a survivor of the war and as a hidden homosexual. That he lingers in metaphorical shadows means that he is in many ways as unknown to us at the end of the film as he is at the start, though the final scene, with him breaking down as he stares at a legless man and is reminded of Wilfred Owen’s “Disabled”, is as close as we get to a glimpse of the real man. Luckily, the shadow world he lives in is smothered in a glossy layer of Terence Davies’ usual box of cinematic tricks (long panning shots, classy dissolves, classical music, stock footage from films). It’s also enlightened by the brutal wit of most of the film’s inhabitants: this is the funniest biopic in many years. Creating an immaculate, impeccably witty surface was how many gay men – who necessarily had to keep much of their lives hidden – learned to cope and survive in those days, after all.
5: Aftersun (dir. Charlotte Wells)
A beautiful warm haze of a debut feature from Charlotte Wells, about a father and daughter holidaying together in Turkey in the late 1990s. Supposedly told in flashback, from the daughter’s perspective as an adult, it mixes footage from a home camcorder recording the trip with remembrances from her so-called “mind camera”, which is of course the film’s actual camera. We get the sense that she’s trying to piece together details about her troubled father from her memory, and we also get the sense that this effort is in vain: he’s too guarded, and she’s too young. Mysteriously, there are also moments that see the director either take us away from the daughter’s perspective altogether, to show us the “reality” of her father Calum’s situation, or alternatively are fantasies still emanating from her (adult or child?) mind. Either way, they add fascination to the film, though you have to concentrate hard to catch them. Frankie Corio is an absolute joy, and an absolute natural, as the 11 year-old daughter, very touching in both her curiosity towards her dad and also dipping her toes in the waters of adult sexuality for the first time. And Paul Mescal continues his roll: Normal People was superb, but this is arguably even better. It’s a last dance between a father and daughter, before the waves of time and other tragedies of life drag them apart.
6: Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy (dir. Ryusuke Hamaguchi)
Made in the same year as his Oscar-nominated Drive My Car (but released in the UK this year), I actually prefer this anthology of stories about how chance and misunderstandings shape our encounters with other people. Hamaguchi may not be the most stylistically unique director – his compositions and camera placements are perfunctory and unfussy – but he is truly outstanding with actors, so the fact that this trio of “short stories” contains so many different actors works hugely in its favour. The final story, like Drive My Car, even works into its narrative an explicit tribute to acting itself, made all the more believable because of how clear it is that Hamaguchi loves actors. The three stories are of two friends who fall in love with the same man, a student who tries to get an older college professor fired by seducing him, and a school reunion where mistaken identity leads to a surreal encounter. The last story is the best, not just for its intriguing fantasy premise where all of the internet has suddenly been wiped and its data lost (the connections between us are so fragile, they can be so easily lost), but also for how it shows us a literal wheel of fortune and fantasy, which I won’t spoil.
7: The Souvenir: Part II (dir. Joanna Hogg)
A sequel to what was my favourite film of 2019, this follows Hogg’s alter ego Julie (Honor Swinton Byrne reprises the role beautifully) as she navigates her way through film school and the recent death of her Foreign Office boyfriend. I can’t think of any other films that so well capture the awkward cadences of everyday conversation, or at least of everyday English conversation. Characters fumble awkwardly in their interactions, but not too awkwardly – it’s not overdone. And if we’re paying attention, we learn to love them all. The one exception is Richard Ayoade, playing a fellow film student, who blossoms with every shot into more and more of a pretentious prick: his show-off attire and hair quickly become a comic highlight, to match his overblown tirades. But it’s it’s the quietly sensitive Julie whose blossoming those of us who treasure these films really want to see, and our patience is rewarded. Julie’s final triumph is not an obvious one, but the harder you look the clearer it shines. For her final film as a student, her coming-of-age if you will, is shown to us not as it really was but as a fantasy playing in Julie’s mind. Nostalgia reworked to acknowledge the element of fantasy involved in remembrance: that’ll do as an intelligent ending to Hogg’s fiercely intelligent two-parter.
8: Parallel Mothers (dir. Pedro Almodóvar)
Almodóvar’s filmography as a whole could in fact be named “Parallel Mothers”: after all, mothers are his favourite type of character (along with actresses). Here’s a film about several more mothers, most of them divorced or single, the main two played by Penélope Cruz (wonderful) and the younger Milena Smit. As Peter Bradshaw pointed out in his review for The Guardian, they aren’t exactly “parallel” mothers, more like “intersecting”, because their lives keep crisscrossing and touching each other in unexpected ways. But what interesting ways those are! As the two reveal to each other aspects of their pasts and futures that had never occurred to them, the threat of Fascism, past and possibly present, looms over them constantly. As Almodóvar argues, Spain has not yet properly confronted its Fascist past: thousands of bodies are still buried in unmarked graves (literal victims of war crimes). That intergenerational trauma, passed down from mother to mother, is clearly shown, and Almodóvar’s attempt to break that chain through this film is beyond admirable.
9: Fire of Love (dir. Sara Dosa)
Must-watch National Geographic documentary about the lives of married-couple volcanologists Katia and Maurice Krafft, a geochemist and a geologist, respectively. Their eager pursuit of samples and footage from the world’s most dangerous volcanoes shows them to have as much of a death wish as Biggie Smalls. Just like Biggie, they meet an inevitable early demise, at the foot of Mount Unzen in Japan. So this is partly a film about the dangers of humans trying to capture the wilds of nature on film. It would make for a suitable double bill with Nope, then, or pretty much any Werner Herzog documentary (I found out after watching that Herzog had actually made two documentaries about this couple). The mock-poetic narration, delivered in a monotone in the style of a Terrence Malick film or a Nathan Fielder show (without the humour), is an irritant: why not let the poetry of the images speak for themselves? Because the photography of the volcanoes – mostly captured by Maurice Krafft himself, at unbelievably close range – are not just some of the most spectacular images I’ve seen in any documentary this year, they’re among the most spectacular I’ve seen in any film.
10: Cow (dir. Andrea Arnold)
Documentary that follows a pair of cows, showing us their daily lives, without voiceover or any other evident form of human input (though there are farmers onscreen, of course). It’s so successful at capturing the world as experienced by these cows, thanks to eye-level camera placement (sometimes the camera is actually kicked or headbutted by the cows) and immersive sound mixing, that it quite genuinely made me feel hungry for grass at one point. That’show fully it allows you to enter and inhabit the world of these animals. The ending is inevitable, but still shocking and heartbreaking. But on a lighter note, to my untrained biologist’s eye, it seems to show in one scene that cows indulge in foreplay. Who moo?
11: Flee (dir. Jonas Power Rasmussen)
A real-life refugee’s tale, narrated by a survivor who fled with his family from Afghanistan after the mujahideen took over Kabul, eventually making it after terrible struggles to Denmark via Russia. It’s told using jerky hand-drawn animation, yet like Waltz with Bashir it doesn’t flinch from showing the brutality of adult conflict. Humankind’s collective failure to take care of some of the most vulnerable people on the planet is etched into every frame; to watch it is to feel shame as well as immense sympathy. Yet like Persepolis, this is so involving as human drama it never overwhelms you with depression. The end result is enlightening: a film about secrets, and about when and how to let them go.
12: Moonage Daydream (dir. Brett Morgen)
This documentary goes for a philosophical rather than a biographical reading of David Bowie’s extraordinary life, so those wanting a straight telling of everything Bowie did and achieved would be better off reading his Wikipedia page. Since Bowie’s approach to life is what he describes early on as a “hodgepodge philosophy”, Brett Morgen himself takes a hodgepodge approach to assembling the hundreds of hours of newsreel clips, interviews, film footage, paintings, music videos, animations, and various other bric-a-brac that comprises this phantasmagoric effort. Bowie’s greatest insight was that life, or at least human existence and our perception of life, is nothing but a series of “Changes”, metamorphoses going off in infinite directions, which he tried to mirror in his ever-morphing artistic personas and musical styles throughout his career. This film successfully shows that, and proves how it makes for a fabulous approach to life. Bowie inspires alll those who connect with his art – which is millions – to try and live forever in the ever-shifting moment, whilst acknowledging that everything is in fact temporary, constantly changing, and efforts to resist that are futile. There’s great beauty in that idea: as there was in Bowie, as there is in this film.
13: Licorice Pizza (dir. Paul Thomas Anderson)
Of course the subject matter is a direct challenge to conventional morality and audience expectations: this is Paul Thomas Anderson we’re dealing with. For better or worse, his films can be seen as a series of provocations – usually for better, because he’s so very, very talented, but also because provocation is vitally important to keep any artistic medium fresh and alive. Unfortunately, some of PTA’s “daringness” can be cringingly cheap, as it is here in the “jokes” about someone doing a fake Japanese accent, moments I hated so much it nearly made me dismiss the entire film. I’m still not sure where I stand on the central age-gap romance thing; a reversal of the “older male” narrative, sure, but an uncomfortable power dynamic nonetheless, and not as ingeniously devised as Phantom Thread. But PTA’s so brilliant and hilarious everywhere else in the film, he won me over in the end. Sean Penn and Bradley Cooper excel when given free rein as utter slimeballs; the troupe of 15 year-olds who try their amateur hand at any roughneck business they can get their hands on generates comedy gold; and Alana Haim makes the whole freewheeling adventure seem worthwhile.
14: Apollo 10 1/2: A Space Age Childhood (dir. Richard Linklater)
More boomer nostalgia, this one has very little new to say about the era of space age optimism and political turmoil that was the late 1960s. But it says its nothing very well, with a breeziness to the rotoscoped animation and editing that is very winning, often hilarious, and evokes the slipperiness of memory perfectly. Its basic observation boils down to just one essential point, but it’s a comical doozy of one: that the moon landing broadcasts were mostly just very boring; they probably put kids to sleep, and a trip to a theme park – or dreamland – would have been preferable as an entertainment choice for them. That wry humour extends to the family sequences, which remind me of A Christmas Story in their careful attention to the details of growing up in a middle-class suburban household. As an added bonus, there’s a scene where one plucky kid changes a song in music class to include the word “balls”, which is the hardest I’ve laughed at anything in a film all year. Just goes to show that some of us never grow up.
15: Bergman Island (dir. Mia Hansen-Løve)
Come for the Ingmar Bergman-styled marital crisis of filmmakers Vicky Krieps and Tim Roth, who go on holiday to the Swedish island of Fårö that Ingmar Bergman lived on to get inspired to write their own screenplays. Stay for the, surprisingly, far more engaging relationship crisis that occurs between Mia Wasikowska and Anders Danielsen Lie (on a roll this year, see also The Worst Person in the World), in the film-within-a-film that springs from Krieps’ mind. Plus, you’ll get a complimentary tour of Fårö, getting to see famous sites from Bergman’s life and films, plus factoids and debates about his merit as a director (my opinion, for what it’s worth, is that he’s equally deserving of his status as a genius and as a scoundrel: both a top 5 director and a miserable user of women). Mia Hansen-Løve’s own merit as a director is starting to become firmly established.
16: Great Freedom (dir. Sebastian Meise)
A prison drama set in post-war Germany, with a gay twist. It also has a rug-pulled-under ending that shows how freedom might have come too late for a certain generation of gay men. This was a generation who came of age too soon before the legalisation of homosexuality, and were forced in and out of jail (and concentration camps) all their lives just because of their sexuality. Truly a lost generation. Anyone who’s been paying attention to German cinema in recent years will know Franz Rogowski, an actor who’s outstanding as usual as one of the lost generation. But it’s Georg Friedrich as his hesitant kind-of-lover – a comforting presence and murderer, compassionate listener and aggressive bully – who is most deserving of close attention. The relationship between the two jailmates is the most curious and surprising one I’ve seen onscreen since Titane. Amusingly, it’s also the second film this year to depict the moon landing as not just a seminal event, but also a very boring one to watch (see Apollo 10 1/2 above).
17: Elvis (dir. Baz Luhrmann)
The most ridiculous film on this list. But also one of the most entertaining. This is another music biopic that’s full of shit, that makes up plenty, and fails to make its characters sound like unscripted people. What’s new? Baz Luhrmann’s irreverent disregard for linear time, conventional space or anything else that might limit his vision (anachronistic rap versions of Elvis’ hits play at times) makes his shit stink a lot less than the “Based on a True Story” pretence of most music biopics. I give him points for casting Tom Hanks in an atypical villainous role, though I agree with most that Hanks goes too far over-the-top (even for a Luhrmann film). Anyway, Austin Butler as Elvis is the true star of the show, in more ways than one. I don’t think it’s an all-time performance, but it’s very clever in showing a man of instinct channelling forces he’s hardly aware of (at least at the start) into a new kind of musical sensation. Thanks to his and Luhrmann’s efforts, Elvis emerges as something of a person, not just a frozen icon of a statue in this film. He really was something new, something unprecedented, and the scenes of early female audiences realising this, with gasps that they hardly even realise are escaping from them, are so well done that they’re worth the price of admission for this film alone. That the film has done so well at the box office cheers me greatly: it shows that people haven’t yet lost interest in Elvis, the person or musician. As they shouldn’t have.
18: A Hero (dir. Asghar Farhadi)
Asghar Farhadi makes films in which seemingly simple decisions by honest-seeming people have unintended consequences, which causes events to quickly spiral out of control, and usually leads to tragedy. Because he’s so careful at showing the justifications of all of these actions, he’s arguably the spiritual successor of Jean Renoir, whose mantra was famously that “everyone has their reasons”. Farhadi’s visual sense isn’t as masterful as Renoir’s, and he’s not quite got the same breathtaking ability to move with ease between comedy and tragedy. But his films, like Renoir’s, are complex moral webs that show competing interests clashing in a modern society where everyone has their reasons but their reasons are often flawed or not sensitive enough to other’s feelings. This results in people constantly sparring with each other, though rarely explosively. A Hero is no exception, showing how a man who appears to be trying to do good in returning a lost bag with gold to its owner, despite his own money troubles, accidentally sets off a chain of events that will serve to disgrace him and his family. It’s heartbreaking and riveting, if not quite as masterful as Farhadi’s earlier works.
19: Three Thousand Years of Longing (dir. George Miller)
“Stories are like breathing” is the film’s best line. Stories are how we try to organise our lives, to convince ourselves that they’re not just meaningless and random, when of course they really are. Stories about his life are what Idris Elba’s djinn is compelled to tell Tilda Swinton’s scholar in Istanbul, when she rescues him from a bottle and wishes only for his companionship. Stories are what this is based on: overtly a short story by master storyteller A.S. Byatt, though the film’s also informed by thousands of years of mythology stretching back to the Arabian Nights. This is a strange choice for director George Miller to follow Mad Max: Fury Road with, and it flopped commercially. But I like it very much. Tilda Swinton and Idris Elba don’t quite catch a spark in their scenes together, but we can see the longing in the eyes of both: the longing to discover meaning through stories, love, and shared stories about love. And that gives the film poignancy. Also, because George Miller runs the millennia-spanning plot at a brisk pace, we never get lost in their self-pity, or our own.
20: Turning Red (dir. Domee Shi)
The whole teenager-turning-into-a-giant-red-panda thing is the best Pixar gambit in a long while. It’s also one of the best metaphors of recent years, because it’s so mutable. It could represent any aspect of change that teenage girls fear: periods, altering bodies, weight and size issues, being unable to control their emotions, sexual awakening, the weight of family expectations… The list goes on. Plus, in the specific case of Mei, a Chinese-Canadian girl, there’s anxiety about the cultural split in her identity between two countries that (coincidence? I think not) both have red dominate their flags. So whilst this film, like all Pixar films of the last 10 years, could have done with more wit and less sentimentality in the script department, its open-endedness and understanding of all young girl’s hopes and fears still makes it a must-watch.
21: Kurt Vonnegut: Unstuck in Time (dir. Robert B. Weide & Don Argott)
I’ve only read Slaughterhouse Five, but that’s enough for me to regard Kurt Vonnegut as a genius and one of the 20th century’s most important writers. So naturally I was hooked by this documentary, which shows that Vonnegut was every bit as sharp, witty and thought-provoking in public as he was in his writing. The film perhaps spends too much time on Robert B. Weide (best-known to me from his work on Curb Your Enthusiasm) and his friendship with Vonnegut. But those moments, interspersed as they are with past interviews and snippets from the author’s life, do help to give the film the kind of time-bending quality that was one of Vonnegut’s (many) fortes in writing. Note to self: MUST. READ. MORE. VONNEGUT.
22: Censor of Dreams (dir. Léo Berne & Raphaël Rodriguez)
Intriguing short that’s apparently hotly tipped for Oscar nomination this year, about a team who create and censor dreams for a woman dealing with a traumatic event in her past. It may be a little crude psychologically, its understanding of how dreams are constructed leaning heavily on Freud. But from the brilliantly framed, kaleidoscopic opening shot onwards, it has a nervy energy to the filming and acting that makes it non-stop compelling to watch.